This is the last of a series of posts I’ve written over the weekend discussing a number of changes to my portfolio over the last two weeks.
Why I took a position in Glacier
While I love it when my stocks go up, it can be frustrating when they go up before I have a chance to talk about them. I bought a starter position in Glacier last week. Here is the buy for my practice portfolio:
I had been planning to say something about Glacier but I wanted to spend a little more time on both the name and the sector to make sure it was indeed a stock I wanted to hold before talking about it. I’m still trying to get comfortable with this whole newsprint theme and Glacier has a few warts on it that I’m still not completely sure about.
However I waited too long. On Friday the stock jumped 10% and closed the day at $1.45 per share.
I have no idea why the stock popped. I thought for sure someone on BNN must have recommended it, but I scoured their on-line videos and found nothing. Who knows, maybe someone said something at a conference or a presentation. We will probably never know. Read more
Third short post summarizing some recent portfolio moves. First two are here and here.
Thoughts on Rock
Every once in a while you luck out and get in just ahead of the crowd. It doesn’t happen very often; usually you have to wait months before an idea begins to play out (ie. my extended comatose with Extendicare). So when it does happen quickly, you have to enjoy it.
I first bought Rock back in August in the $1.60’s. I added to it in the $1.80’s and again in the $1.90’s. Two months later its sitting at $3.35 and has been as high as $3.70. That’s quite a move.
Nevertheless, the biggest thing that has happened to the stock between then and now are people waking up to it being cheap (I am told that Keith Schaefer for one, a newsletter writer, has apparently said some positive things about the stock). And that gives me pause. Read more
In my post from earlier today I mentioned that I had made some portfolio changes over the past fews weeks and would be sharing them in a series of short posts. In this one I want to talk about what I did and then undid because of the debt ceiling.
In my last monthly update, posted on the 12th, I wrote about how I was reducing exposure to stocks in response to the uncertainty about the debt ceiling.
In my accounts I go into the weekend with more than 25% cash (I’m a little under that in the practice account I show here, at around 23% including my remaining Novus position, as I didn’t quite keep up with the selling I was doing elsewhere). I should perhaps be at an even higher level, but many of the stocks I own are so obscure and out of the mainstream that I feel some confidence that they will be spared some of the carnage that will occur if the debt ceiling is not raised out of indifference alone. The stocks I trimmed the most were the one’s that have proven most volatile to market swings.
By Tuesday of the next week, October 15th, I had moved to a little over 35% cash in my accounts. I received a few comments that this was a silly move, that the US government wouldn’t be stupid enough to let its interest payments lapse. They turned out to be right. Nevertheless, I stand by my decision; I work hard to grow my portfolio and putting that hard work at risk on the assumption that the people in positions of power will do the sensible thing is, in my mind, an unnecessary risk. Remember Dick Fuld? Read more
I’ve made a number of moves in my portfolio over the last couple of weeks and in a few cases the stocks I’ve bought have already started to move so I thought I’d dedicate a few short posts this weekend to talking about the changes before things get any further.
A couple of Gold Stock Positions
I haven’t been in any gold stocks since the spring. When I sold out of my positions, I gave the following state of the union.
But the path gold takes to get there could be rocky. In particular, its clear that the market believes that quantitative easing has worked. And indeed, the US economy is getting better. Whether the economy, and the financial markets, can continue to improve without massive injections of money is an open question. But until that question is answered, which could be 6-12 months away, the working assumption appears to be that it will, and that is going to be bad for gold.
A number of reasons led me to foray back into gold stocks last week. First of all, the debt ceiling appeared to be and finally did get settled on what seems to be a pretty temporary basis. Second, Janet Yellen was announced as the Fed Chairman beginning next year. Third, the latest economic data for the US economy is looking pretty milk-toasty, and fourth, the gold stocks I look at were at or lower than the levels in June and thus were reflecting none of this. I tweeted the following on October 15th.
I have a tendency to go overboard when I’m writing up a new company. There is so much to say. The business, the growth opportunities, the competitors, the financials, the risk factors, it goes on. I get half way through the write-up, look at the novel I’ve written and say, what am I doing here?
This is a blog. Its meant to be bite sized quips. Its intent is to share the investment ideas I have, discuss the reasons behind them and hopefully get feedback from others that help me distill the ideas down further and maybe get a few new ones as well. I’m not getting anything for, nor do I think anyone is looking for, an exhaustive multi-page diatribe outlining every nuisance of the idea at hand. If you are you should probably pay for it.
So after I’ve written a rambling soliloquy that no one is going to read, I take a step back and ask myself: what is the most important point here? What’s the thing that makes this investment worthwhile? Read more
See the end of the post for the current make up of my portfolio and the last four weeks of trades.
I always write words like those in the title with some trepidation. I’m never really sure if things are back on track, or just bouncing on their way to oblivion.
Nevertheless, the tangible evidence is that my portfolio has recovered and made new highs in the last month. I had a blip to the downside in August, and when I look back on that blip, I can attribute it to a few bad decisions. There was Niko Resources, Walker and Dunlop and Dex Media obviously and to a lesser extent Vitran and AMBAC. All of these stocks had flaws that I should have recognized and gave greater consideration to, and none of these stocks deserved to be allocated outsized starter positions, yet in the case of Niko and Dex Media that is exactly what I did.
I’ve gone back to the drawing board since then. I’ve tried to be more careful with my stock selection, tried to spend more time thinking through each idea before adding a position, and tried to work with the attitude that an opportunity passed up is better than one taken and lost on. Read more
On September 19th I received an email from a friend (hat tip
@VermeulenGold) that an activist investor, Orange Capital, had taken a 5% position in PHH and written a letter to management outlining their recommendations on creating shareholder value. I immediately took a position in the stock.
In order to describe why I acted so quickly, let’s go back to why I sold PHH in the spring. There were two reasons. One was my concern that gain on sale margins would compress significantly – a concern that remains valid today (and could still be my undoing with the stock). The other was that there just didn’t seem to be a catalyst to realize the valuation gap that I saw.
Now, with that catalyst having materialized, I want to be along for the ride.
I wrote about PHH over a year ago. I described the company as having Joel Greenblatt type of spin-off potential. The company had two disparate businesses with little in common. There were aspects of the one business that clouded the accounting of the other. And one of those businesses, mortgage origination, had a not well understood but valuable asset in the mortgage servicing rights that were held.
Now that I have had a chance to read the Orange Capital letter in full, I am happy to see them draw similar conclusions. I added to my position in the company on Monday. It’s a 4.5% position.
The Orange Capital Letter
I would recommend reading the letter in full, it is available here, but briefly, these are the four initiatives suggested by Orange Capital: Read more