Skip to content

Research: DLH Holdings

DLHC is a stock I bought in April and sold later in June or July and now I bought it again on Monday.

They have some debt that they took when they made a big acquisition last year, and they aren’t in a great business or anything – this is basically staffing and project deployment. And they have some customer retention issues – as you’ll read there is a small business set aside that could bump them with the VA, but from what I read they would still end up as a sub-contractor anyway so its not as big of a deal as it sounds.

Its a cheap stock, and really that’s the thesis. It trades at 5.5x FCF. The larger staffing companies trade at 8x to 10x EBITDA. It is not going to the moon but I think it should be worth more than this.

  • market cap of $98mm at $8
  • trades at 4.5x EV/EBITDA, 7.1x P/E, 5.5x FCF
  • revenue is expected to grow if analyst estimates can be believed – 34% growth yoy in 2020
  • they provide professional healthcare and social services
  • geared at: large-scale federal health and human service initiatives
  • over 1,000 employees
  • 100% of revenue is from Federal gov’t
  • agencies they service include: VA, HHS and DoD from their legacy business
  • also NIH and CMS from the SSS business they acquired last year
  • revenue last year can be divided between 3 markets within the Federal govt:
  1. Defense and Veteran Health Services – 45% of revenue
  2. Human Services and Solutions – 20%
  3. Public Health and Life Sciences – 35%
  • before they acquired SSS the VA was 65% of revenue
  • it isn’t just contract labor, they do provide labor but also are responsible for delivering some processes,services on behalf of the gov’t
  • these services are to gov’t – to Veteran Affairs, Health and Human Services, DoD
  • there is definitely contract risk though – before renewing they had 9 contracts with the VA that were coming due in Oct 2019 – so a loss of these would have been devastasting
  • there were some contracts that they were precluded on bidding on at renewal because they were supposed to go to small business
  • but the RFP for the renewal is off the table, at least for now, this is what they said on Q3 10Q:

As previously reported, a single renewal request for proposal (“RFP”) had been issued for the nine (9) pharmacy contracts that required the prime contractor be a service-disabled veteran owned small business (“SDVOSB”), which would have precluded us from bidding on the RFP as a prime contractor. We had joined a SDVOSB team as a subcontractor to respond to this RFP. However, the government has canceled the previously issued RFP for these contracts. The government has neither indicated nor announced its future procurement strategy. Due to the time required to conduct a procurement process, we expect these contracts to be further extended

  • They aren’t impacted much by COVID.  In March 25th presentation they said:
  • – since then have actually won business due to COVID in Q220
  • – they do have net debt of $42mm – this is down from $55mm at beginning of year – and from over $63mm at time of acquisition
  • – they took on debt in the large SSS acquisition last year

Q120 Results

  • they had $5mm EBITDA in Q12020
  • reduced debt by $4.8mm in January
  • said past 6m are good benchmark for going forward – had $106mm of revenue, $6.5mm OI, and $10mm EBITDA in last 6m
  • not surprisingly operating margins are tight – 6% in Q12020
  • Q12020 results were EPS of 13c, cash flow from ops before WC of $4.2mm, capex is minimal
  • if I go back to F2019 – EPS was 44c, $13mm of cash flow before WC, $0.4mm capex – so trading at 4x FCF
  • debt was only $7.2mm in FY2018 – so it was all debt for acquisition

Q220 Results

  • Q2 was a little weaker
  • revenue was down a little because of COVID – the revenue they get includes “accommodation” so travel of employees, expenses
  • saw some organic yoy growth but they didn’t qualify how much
  • they didn’t get this in Q220 b/c of COVID
  • but almost all the rest of revenue is directly related to their contract workers:

numbers of workdays and slight things like that, that represents about 93% to 95% of our revenue quarter-in, quarter-out. The remaining 5% to 7% is comprised of what we would call accommodation revenue, so things that you would not independently seek to bid on

  • still had EPS of 16c per share, $5.5mm of EBITDA
  • also generated $10mm of cash
  • debt down to $44.5mm – expect reduction to $40mm by YE
  • received contracts to assist the National Institutes of Health in their fight against infectious diseases – in this case, COVID-19. With recent awards expected to generate approximately $15 million in calendar 2020
  • this is related to COVID trial – so I think they are administering the trials, so the amt and timing depends on the progress of those trials
  • could be additional revenue from other yet to be announced COVID programs – its changing all the time

Social & Scientific Systems Acquisition

  • provide healthcare staffing
  • to: Department of Health & Human Services – including the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) – along with other healthcare-related institutions
  • 400 employees
  • paid $70mm for acquisition of Social & Scientific Systems, Inc – $63mm net of cash that they would receive from tax rebate
  • expected that they would contribute $65mm of revenue annually
  • had a backlog of $346mm at time of acquisition

Acquisition of Irving Burton Associates

  • acquired for $32mm
  • provides government healthcare research and IT services to clients including the US Army Medical Research and Development Command, the Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center (TATRC), and the Defense Health Agency.
  • increases DLH’s overall portfolio of services
  • likely improves the company’s contract bid prospects relative to competitors in the government healthcare services space.
  • company’s current revenue run-rate is ~$25M annually with a $143M outstanding backlog.

Research: Rada IM-SHORAD

Rada has been a frustrating stock. The pullback in the stock is unwarranted from what I can see. Rada gets no respect. Even though Rada grew revenue 75% yoy in Q220, year to date order are up over 100%, revenue guidance increased to $70mm, announced another $10mm of orders recently, the stock has gone from $7.75 to under $6 over the last few months.

What can you do? Only buy more, which is what I have been doing.

This weekend I saw the article referenced below. The IM-SHORAD production deal looks like it is done. Rada has been delivering prototypes for testing over the past couple years – now production orders should be coming soon. Estimates are for at least $60mm of revenue from this next year (from Canaccord). Maybe the stock will get some respect.

Notes I’ve accumulated on IM-SHORAD below, including the article.

  • program is sold to through DRS relationship:

Leonardo DRS. DRS is a major player in the defense electronics market in North America, with a focus on tactical systems and radars. In 2017, we signed a cooperation agreement with DRS to market and sell our tactical radars in the North American market for counter-UAV, short-range air defense, and other solutions. DRS has acquired a few MHR radars and is actively promoting our radars as part of their system solutions. In 2018, DRS was selected by the US Army as the mission equipment package provider for the Army’s IM-SHORAD program, which includes our MHR radars as onboard search sensors

  • DRS is a prime on the product along with GD and Raytheon (from this article)
  • Rada delivers the radars, i believe 4 radars per set, 1 set per UAV
  • from July 2018: RADA Electronic Industries announced that its Multi-Mission Hemispheric Radar (MHR) will be integrated into the Leonardo DRS mission equipment package (MEP) solution for the U.S. Army?s Initial Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense (IM-SHORAD) capability
  • nine prototype systems will be the basis for a future production decision of more than 140 systems, beginning in 2020.
  • is a $60mm annual opportunity in 2021 and 2022 – Canaccord initiation report
  • From Q219 cc:

IM-SHORAD is the army program, the Marine Corp is named GBAD. The army program is not a typical program of record. It evolved as an urgent need to a very rapid program. And probably all of us, some of us have seen that in the U.S. — AUSA conference being depicted as from slide to prototype within less than a year. So I think everybody involved, including the U.S. Army, are very proud of this momentum. The program itself is a sizable program for us. It’s close to 150 vehicles. And if it goes as planned, then it is now — it was already published by the program executive officer that if it started testing, we do see revenue start towards end of 2020 or mainly, again, 2021. And again, the testing and validation typically takes quite a few months until everybody is settled.

  • from Q419 call:

IM-SHORAD is not yet in a deployable situation. However, let me describe a bit our understanding of the case here. Maybe you have followed and noted that the U.S. Military is actually closing down some forward operating bases and moving troops to centralized locations because they cannot protect and they don’t have enough means to sense and warn against the fires that they have been suffering from recently. So my understanding is that the US Army at least is using what they have already in the inventories. And this is typically the heavy equipment, the C-RAM heavy equipment.

  • from Q120 call:

We have delivered 7 sets, which is 28 radars, maybe 30 with some spares. We are delivering soon another set of 4. But these are prototype sets, and as we mentioned in the discussion, we expect to get the several production orders later this year.

  • in presentation estimate it at 600+ radars when all is said and done – maybe more, not sure but Rada references 3x to 5x potential at one point, not sure if that is referring to potential vs. the 600 known radars

Green light From article:

  • US Army just announced green light Oct/4/20:
  • The US Army announced last week that it has given the green light for initial production of an Interim Maneuver Short-Range Air Defense (IM-SHORAD) system
  • article titled: “Huge contract for Israel’s RADA: US Army procuring dozens of IM-SHORAD vehicles”
  • awarded to GD – Rada partner
  • $1.2b contract
  • deal will run through Sept 2025

Research: Inspired Entertainment

I bought a small bit of this one this week at a little under $3. I don’t love it, but I do think its reasonable and its probably a bit of a post-COVID play, given that they were getting creamed on the top line from casinos and bars being closed or empty. But I remain a little wishy-washy on it because I played their virtual games online (you can play them for free here) and they were kinda boring to me and they don’t really generate FCF so far.

Just to catch up on the week, I also bought some ELMD today, I’ll get my research on that out. I’ve been watching that one for a while, it has been quite the waterfall but its getting back to a level it seems interesting. I also bought some CWH earlier this week on its pullback, sold my Luby’s yesterday, sold 1/3rd of my Innodata on the pop earlier this week (why is it going up?) and sold Enlivex on the COVID results (its like 5 patients so its probably a little ahead of itself, though it does make sense as a treatment).

Anyway, here is some notes on Inspired Entertainment:

  • $67mm market cap at $3.00, whole lot of debt
  • global games technology company
  • supply virtual sports, mobile gaming and server-based gaming systems
  • customers are lottery, betting, gaming operators

Segments

  • operate 4 segments:

Gaming

  • gaming is digital slots and gaming machines that are in casinos, bars, etc
  • server based so you get change in/out games without replacing machine
  • 2,900 additional terminals contracted for deployment
  • 32,800 terminal out there at end of Q220 – this is down 10% yoy
  • they collect revenue sometimes on sales of SBGs and sometimes through participation
  • their games are located on a network – distributed to casinos, allows them to access broader market
  • They get an avg participation rate in the games of 6% – so 6% of profits goes to them
  • They describe it like this – Customer Gross Win accrued in the period after deducting gaming taxes (defined as a regulatory levy paid by the Customer to government bodies) and applying the Company’s contractual revenue share percentage
  • This has been majority of revenue – more than half last year, and was ~70% of revenue in Q419 before COVID
  • Operate in UK, Greece, Italy Illinois
  • 75% comes from UK operations

Virtual Sports

  • available in 44,000 retail channels, 300 websites
  • they receive portion of revenue generated from the game plus upfront license
  • these are games like Golf, Basketball, Soccer, Horse Racing, etc:
  • It doesn’t look like its real players or teams, they use plays off of names
  • Its not exactly a video game, it looks close to real, and you basically watch a match, which is not a whole match – for golf its like a hole or 3 holes – and you bet on the winner, long drive, etc
  • I played the golf and basketball, it seems kinda boring to me tbh but what do I know
  • I think the “interactive” segment, which is just a subset of Virtual Sports, are just the games that aren’t sports related, so the bingo, lotto and the Centurion and Reel King – which are just slots from what I can tell

Novomatic

  • This is the acquired business
  • acquired Oct 2019
  • supplier of Category B1, B3, C and D gaming terminals
  • while the other segments are asset-light these guys are basically terminal manufacturers
  • this is a different business than the rest – these guys sell “analog machines” while the rest of what they do is digital gaming over a network
  • products are installed at pubs, arcades, motorway service areas and holiday resorts in the UK
  • but it is a high margin business – if you take a look at the Pro-forma below its more than 75% gross margins
  • I’m not sure I understand the acquisition – it seems to be something about taking this Novomatic and making their analog machines, which is their bread and butter, digital, to make them more profitable
  • They go to pains in their presentation to differentiate and show how much digital is:

By Area

  • have 16,000 machines in UK – this seems low?
  • Scotland is about 10% of volume
  • – 8,300 machines in Greece, recently deployed 380 Valor terminals
  • Recently sold 161 Valor terminals in Illinois – said they have sold 275 in the US in total – I’m not sure if that is all Illinois or some other state(s) as well?
  • Are planning to deploy 100 terminals into Western Canada

Financials

  • this is the pro-forma EBITDA including the Novomatic business for 2019:
  • would have been $68mm
  • right now EV is $320mm – 4.7x EBITDA
  • They generate decent EBITDA but it doesn’t really follow through into FCF:
  • I probably need to dig into why the FCF is so bad (whats the CAPEX?)

Customers

  • operators of lotteries, licensed sports bookmakers, gaming and bingo halls, casinos and regulated online operators, adult gaming centers, pubs, holiday parks, and motorway service areas
  • key customers: William Hill, SNAI, Sisal, Lottomatica, Betfred, Paddy Power Betfair, Genting, Bet365, Sky Bet, Fortuna, the Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics S.A. (OPAP S.A.), GVC Holdings Plc (including Ladbrokes Coral), the Pennsylvania Lottery, Bourne Leisure, Greentube, Stonegate, Mitchells & Butler, Marstons PLC, Greene King, JD Wetherspoon PLC, Park Dene Resort, Centre Parcs Resorts and Novomatic. Geographically

Q2 Results

  • basically, their entire retail business shut down in March
  • their online business accelerated – Virtual Sports:

Our Q2 performance is noteworthy due to the outstanding performance from the online virtuals part of that business, which increased over Q1 by 76% and was 109% higher than the same quarter in 2019.

  • their retail business is small, local venues, expect them to come back online quickly
  • said they are beginning to see a quick ramp in Greece, Italy and UK
  • in Greece operating above pre-COVID levels
  • in UK are seeing less machines operating at William Hill due to distancing
  • Italy numbers close but slightly lower than pre-covid
  • they reduced their headcount from 1,800 to 300
  • managed to be EBITDA positive in Q220 – $2mm of EBITDA
  • their margin actually goes up when shops close if revenue of remaining shops increases proportionately

Research: Datadog

I should be spending my time researching a stock I might buy or at least short.  DDOG is neither.  But I still find it super interesting to look at so I spent a bunch of time on it.  I really didn’t look at everything.  I got caught up on pricing, which I will explain, and spent a lot of time on it.  I captured a few comments and such as highlights but I read way more in terms of opinion and perception of DDOGs product.  These are my thoughts.

Here is the thing about DDOG.  It is, by all accounts, a great product.  You read the forums, it is best in class by most accounts.

But.  A couple problems.  First, this is not some revolutionary technology.  What DDOG has is a monitoring tool.  It really boils down to a GUI – a dashboard.  Yes, there are all these tie-ins to data and sampling algorithms and a bunch of other functionality has been added to it as modules and blah, blah, blah.  But its all basically – how can we allow IT folks to see what is going on in their network better.  When you boil that down, the thing that everyone loves about DDOG is essentially a workflow and a GUI.  That’s it.

Now it appears to be an extremely good workflow and GUI.  No question there.  But there is no magic here.  Watch these videos.  Go and search DDOG in youtube and watch the other customer videos.  They make it pretty clear what the product does.

Meanwhile, as you will see below, DDOG is VERY expensive.  IT guys are complaining about the price left and right.  I point it out below.  When I read the cost/host I thought it was ridiculous.  I know how cheap IT guys are.  They are always chintzy on spending money.  There is a point where IT balks at 5-6-(7?) figure DDOG bills for monitoring.  I certainly don’t think the TAM is what DDOG says it is if they are getting to a TAM by assuming every instance and host gets wired up to DDOG at current pricing.  No way that happens.

The other thing about DDOG is this is niche.  It appears to be a very large market because they can multiply hosts by ARR and get a massive number.  But there are probably a handful or two of people in each company that actually need to look at this sort of monitoring data on a regular basis.  Contrast that with a TEAM – they have a model where their TAM is the number of DEV/OPS multiplied by their sub price per user.  Their users are all using the product every day.  And the users are the entire DEV/OPS team.  That is really different, if you ask me, than a TAM that is a far fewer number of IT admins that are actively deciding how much they want to spend to monitor their hosts.

I just don’t think this lasts.  At some point a smart IT admin is going to say – hey I can cut $50k out of my budget if I move from DDOG to this or that or just bring it in house. I think you see this already.  DDOG customer growth is less than half their overall growth.  So much of their growth is existing customers growing their instances of DDOG – or, if you believe some of the horror stories from reddit, getting gouged on pricing from unrealized monitoring that they are billed with.

Not surprisingly, NEWR reduced pricing and added a freemium layer.  I’m sure they realize that DDOG has an Achilles heel in their pricing.  I wouldn’t buy NEWR on that – it seems to me to have its own problems, but I also bet it starts making more IT guys ask – is this really worth it?

Of course to some it is.  It sounds like a great product.  Great graphs, easy to integrate, slick to use.  But I don’t buy that a great experience is worth this kind of multiple.  The moat here is way smaller than investors think it is, IMO and some of these competitors, or maybe some new start-up, is going to take advantage of that and start taking share at some point.

 

  • founded in 2010
  • 1,403 employees
  • cloud native, SaaS platform addressing observability – monitoring cloud technologies
  • offers “single pane of glass” view of IT cloud environments
  • they break down silos between Dev and Ops
  • their initial use case was infrastructure monitoring, from there expanded to APM and logging
  • now added network monitoring, synthetics, security monitoring

Customers

  • 12,100 customers as of Q220
  • Had 8,800 customers as of Q219 – so customer growth was 37.5%
  • Have 1,015 large customers, up from 594 yoy
  • large customers are those with $100k or more – these are most of the revenue
  • has net retention rates above 130%
  • most customers adopt multiple products – 68% of customers have multiple products, up from 40% yoy

Product

  • an event stream to see what has been going on in your environment
  • so you tie in your hosts and integration by installing your agent into each
  • then you create dashboards to see operations of each host and integration
  • two types of dashboards – screenboards and timeboards
  • can choose what hosts or integrations you want to show on the dashboard, what metrics, etc
  • the graphs that you can create are quite detailed, very customizable, queryvalue maps, hostmaps. etc
  • they have integrations to tie in a bunch of different
  • functions – surface the relevant data you are collecting – transform the data with stuff like absolute value, log function, interpolation, divided by time
  • notifications – get alerts – two types, desktop, emails, but also can add to snap, PD, ServiceNow, Zendesk
  • can send notifications in a comment for any event in event stream
  • use monitors to send notification when some metric is triggered
  • collects metrics every 15s or so
  • I’m surprised the TAM for this is so large?

Pricing

  • they have a freemium model, with a low end first tier
  • model is on pay per host/application base – you pay for each instance that you monitor with DDOG
  • it seems like they charge a lot:

  • $23/host/month seems expensive
  • when I type in “datadog expensive” into google these are the two ads I get:

  • another site making the point:

  • their application performance monitoring is expensive as well: APM list  pricing  starts  at  $31/host/month  and  app  analytics  list  pricing  is  for  $1.70/million analyzed spans/month.
  • Competition
  • compete against Dynatrace, which has a cloud based service with similar functionality, and New Relic, which had an on-premise solution that they are offering now at a cheaper price
  • NEWR is offering a free tier that they say would cost $10,000 with competitors
  • but they changed tiers – reduced from 11 SKUs to 3 SKUs, results in some prices going up:

  • NEWR is definitely decelerating – growth rate was only 15% last quarter
  • DDOG has revenue retention in the 130% range
  • this is an interesting take:

Despite all the buzz on Datadog, New Relic still has an entrenched presence in the infrastructure/application monitoring space as one of the original vendors, and though Datadog is gaining mindshare that doesn’t mean the space isn’t still new and greenfield enough for two big players By next fiscal year, Wall Street consensus expects both companies to be at a similar scale (~$750 million in annual revenues), but Datadog is now trading at >8x New Relic’s market cap. Despite New Relic’s lower growth, both New Relic and Datadog are cash flow positive

  • also Datadog has “shady pricing”:

  • the problem is, their product is basically just a GUI with a bunch of hooks into other apps/hosts to sample data – this is not some crazy IP that can’t be replicated