Sherritt and the Indonesian Nickel Ban
I spent my free time during the last couple of days reviewing Sherritt International. I wanted to get some more clarity on my investment and come to a conclusion about the size of the position that I should have. As I have talked about in the past, my free time is limited and so my upfront research on names can be less than complete. I usually take small starter positions, between 1-3%, and then increase the size of those positions once I have had time to digest and review the idea in more detail.
As I tweeted last week, there were a number of catalysts that led me to take a position in Sherritt:
Took a position in Sherritt $S.CA – stock has been pummelled b/c of slow ramp of Ambatovy Ni mine, too much debt, low Ni/Coal prices (1/4)
— L.Sigurd (@LSigurd) January 17, 2014
I see # of catalysts. First, if Indonesia Ni export ban holds stockpiles will run down by some time in 15, see: http://t.co/cQShvQi7eQ (2/4)
— L.Sigurd (@LSigurd) January 17, 2014
Second, Ambatovy has struggled to get to commercial production but will pass milestone in Q1. Third, activist pushing from Clarke (3/4)
— L.Sigurd (@LSigurd) January 17, 2014
Fourth, sales of coal operations should dampen the “over leveraged” argument, provide flexibility, narrow focus to Ni and Oil (4/4)
— L.Sigurd (@LSigurd) January 17, 2014
After digging deeper into the name, the conclusion that I came to is that Sherritt is really a play on nickel. I think that as goes the price of nickel, so goes Sherritt. Read more




