Skip to content

Adventures in Ethanol

Over the last week I have played some parts of the ethanol yo-yo well and other parts not so well. Let me review.

On the well side, I significantly reduced my extremely over-sized position in Pacific Ethanol (25% of my portfolio at its peak) at prices of about $23 per share.  On the not-so-well side, I added/subtracted and then added back my position in Rex Energy on continuously declining prices and held on to a still not insignificant percentage of Pacific Ethanol (about 5% position) through the declines of Thursday and Friday.  What is yest to be determine is that I added back some of Pacific Ethanol at $20.15 on Thursday. While I sold half of that on Friday morning for a bit of a profit, I held the other half through the decline on Friday and now sit with those shares at a lower price than I had purchased them for.

How this all ends remains to be seen.  This blog is not intended to be an account of my infallibility. Unlike many others on the blogosphere and on twitter, I have no omniscient insight into what can be absolutely stated as a good or bad decision.  Thus it is that you rarely see me laying out the ridicule, condescension or my favorite, the passive-aggressive rhetoric, that seems to be so prevalent in these mediums.  I can only wish for such certitude.  Unfortunately my world is far too gray to not feel empathetic for those who hold a different opinion than mine.

The beauty and horror of the ethanol stock is that it only takes a small difference of opinion to lead to a drastically different conclusion.  To take an example that I tweeted earlier tonight, in my model I get a $1 quarterly earning swing by adjusting the ethanol price by 20 cents – from $2.05 to $1.85 per gallon (note I originally had written 80c but I hadn’t been making an apples to apples comparison in my model).  A similar point could be made about Pacific Ethanol.  The significance of course is that 20 cents is about the swing that ethanol prices took in the last week.

I’ve heard a lot of talk that the decline is because of the recent subsidy put in place by the Brazilian leader Dilma Rousseff, who is desperately trying to protect her diminishing lead in the upcoming presidential election.  I even was forwarded a newsletter writer who sold out of his position in the ethanol stocks on this news.  I find that puzzling.  The subsidy is 0.3% on exports this year and 3% on exports next year.  This seems to me to be a minuscule amount which I can’t see affecting production decisions, saying nothing of the Brazilian drought that I would think makes any near term impact moot.

Far more interesting will be the conclusion of the Brazilian election and whether there is a change to the gasoline ceiling.  Both leading presidential candidates have publicly stated that they will raise the price of gasoline if elected (articles here and here).  As the second article points out “only 25 percent of Brazil’s flex-fuel cars were filled up with ethanol last year, down from 82 percent in 2009, as the fuel became relatively more expensive than gasoline in most parts of the country”.  If Brazil allowed gas to float at market I would suspect you would see somewhat less ethanol available for export, even if it was 3% cheaper via tax.

I think that the true culprit of the decline is the drop in the price of oil.  The drop in oil has lead to the drop in gasoline which has, at least to some extent, led to the drop in ethanol and perhaps more importantly, led to fear that the bursting of the oil bubble is upon us.  That has created a lot of fear that ethanol margins are fast disappearing for good.

What makes me doubt this thesis is that we are actually pretty close to the lows that the ethanol market has seen in some time.  You have to go back to 2010 to see a time when prices were able to sustain a price below $1.80 per gallon.  This includes long periods where inventories were much higher.

To think we are going to see another sustained leg down in the price of ethanol suggests to me the expectation that something has fundamentally changed in the market.  Yet the most likely fundamental changes I see are likely to the upside.  I refer you to the Green Plains second quarter conference call.  On that call they said that while third quarter export volumes were weak, they had seen a significant pick-up in the fourth and first quarter.  They had already sold forward about 15% of their production in both quarters to the export market.  They saw demand from “non-traditional” sources such as India and Brazil.  And that they were holding back on hedging too much production in the fourth and first quarters because of the “interesting” pricing dynamic that they saw developing.  I think these points, taken together, are worth considering.

At the same time we wait for the EPA ethanol mandate decision.  With corn holding a 3-handle, gasoline demand in 2014 proving stronger than was originally expected and some election races in the corn belt looking too close to call, its not hard to imagine a significant revision up to the ethanol mandate.

On the other hand, momentum is certainly against these names and sometimes that is all that matters.

There are indeed many moving parts to the ethanol story but I think the focus is only on the negatives the last couple of days.   If you think oil is going to $85 then maybe there is further downside.  But if you think we just saw a reversal in oil,that we perhaps saw a reversal in ethanol on Thursday, then I’m not so sure its a good idea to panic into this decline.

With all of that said I reserve the right to change my opinion as the facts change and to sell shares even as my opinion does not change but the share price does.  Because I, unlike many others, do not see anything wrong with holding dissenting views with equal compassion, and I do not see anything wrong with acting against one’s own convictions even as those convictions are still held.  Such, in my opinion, is the nature of survival.  Perhaps if we all actually had to survive rather than be buoyed into complacency by whatever compensation that makes it worth our while, we would not be so quick to judge others as though the world was black and white.

 

Advertisements
3 Comments Post a comment
  1. Anonymous #

    What are your thoughts about natural gas. I think the price is going to spike in the coming months due to cold winter predictions, the historical imbalance between the price of oil and natural gas, and the start of natural gas exports from the us. One particular name that seems significantly undervalued is quicksilver resources(kwk). They are trading at 1 per share now. The biggest concern with the company is its debt. In fact they have 1.7b of debt or so. However, most of the debt is not due until 2019. They are sitting on a huge asset property called the horn river basin, it has 14 tcf resource potential. This is a huge amount and they are working on getting a Jv to export natural gas to Asian markets. This low value play reminds me of pacific ethanol. The company turned down a buyout offer in 2011 for near 15 per share, it has over 30% management interest. In April of 2013, they announced 25% stake sale to toyko gas for there Barnett asset. Finally, they have recently struck an oil gold mine in west Texas with there jv with eni. The biggest concern is the near term debt maturity in 2016. However, this is expected to be retired this year. Once the 2016s are retired, I expect the stock to take off, along with the potential rise in natural gas prices. Finally the stock should reach the 5 to 10 range with the horn river basin jv. Just some thoughts. It is a high risky beta play on natural gas, but I certainly think there asset base can cover any near term debt concerns. Any thoughts on KWK!

    September 18, 2014
    • Thanks for the idea. If we have another cold winter what you are saying will happen. I’ve held onto SFY on the hope that occurs. I’ll take a look at quicksilver

      September 21, 2014
      • Anonymous #

        I am considering adding to some coal names as well. Natural gas and coal stocks remind me of mortgage insurers back in 2009, 2011 etc. Everyone said Radian Group and MGIC were going bankrupt. They both surged from under 1 per share to near or +10 per share. I think stocks like FST, KWK, ANR, ACI will have similar fortunes over the next 2 years. I am certainly bullish on natural gas and coal. As noted, KWK is my favorite as I think it has the most exponential potential. For management to hold over 30% of the shares outstanding and to decline a buyout offer at 15 per share, I tend to think management will do everything in their power to make sure the company survives. Further, I think natural gas will be closer to 7-10 over the coming years and will close the gap with the price of natural gas in other parts of the world.

        September 22, 2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: