Posts tagged ‘atna resources’

Mar 10

Week 88: Take-off (MTG, RDN, MBI, PKI, NTI, IMH, WD)

Portfolio Performance

See the end of the post for Portfolio Composition and weekly trades.

A week of Significant Gains from RDN, MTG, MBIA

The last seven days have been extremely good ones for my portfolio. This has been primarily due to the price appreciation of MGIC, Radian Group and MBIA. As regards MGIC and Radian, I have written so much about these two names, done so much work trying to understand the business (and trying to understand how other people were trying to understand the business), that it is quite rewarding to see it play out the way that it has.

It is amazing to me that MGIC has more than doubled (from a $2.40 low to a $6.10 high) during 5 days when the only notable disclosure was that the company had the ability to raise capital. Someone with an interest in market psychology should really write a piece on MGIC – you could call it the Existential Security.

I reduced my position in both Radian and MGIC by a little more than half during the early part of this week. My sales of MGIC occurred around $5.20 while those with Radian were at a little over $10. I don’t have plans on selling any more of either.

I sold the positions down because they were getting very large (particularly in the case of MGIC) and because my thesis, that these companies would be able to survive, has now played out. What is going to drive the stocks going forward is the long-term potential of the mortgage insurance business and how well each company can capitalize on it. Read more

Feb 19

5 Comments

Week 85: Some Short Thoughts on Nam Tai, Yellow Media, Radian Group and Atna Resources

Portfolio Performance

Update

I finished a post over the weekend giving some thoughts about the macro-environment and how it pertains to my portfolio. As a consequence of the conclusions drawn, my portfolio has been growing and my cash level decreasing, to the point where I have now been on margin for the last month and a half. Right now I have about 11% margin. While I am typically wary of using margin, when I look at what I own there are no stocks that I feel compelled to reduce. We’ll see if this turns out to be folly. This is, however, about as much risk as I’m comfortable with, so any stocks added hereon will have to be balanced by equivalent removals. And as per the strategy I profess, I will sell without remorse if the market turns abruptly.

On to some of the moves I made over the past 3 weeks. Read more

Jun 6

8 Comments

Comparing Gold Producers

Every quarter I spend an evening or two going through the reports of the 15 or so gold stocks that I follow and updating a spreadsheet that I use to track their progress and compare them against each other.

I do not use the spreadsheet in the way a strict value investor might. I do not search out and buy the cheapest gold stock of the bunch on a cash flow metric or per ounce metric. I do look for value, but I also look for growth. The stock market tends to treat gold producers in much the same way they treat any other business: stocks with superior growth potential get bid up to higher valuations. On the other side of the coin, you can sit on what appears to be an undervalued producer for a long time if that producer has a poor pipeline of projects or has no prospects to produce near term incremental ounces.

I did exactly that recently with Aurizon Mines. I was attracted to the value, it was cheap compared to its peers, it had a lot of cash on its balance sheet and no debt, and they have a well run and profitable operation at Casa Berardi. Yet Aurizon does not have a strong growth pipelne. Its closest to completion project is an open pit prospect called Joanna which, while it could one day produce a lot of gold, has been stuck in the feasibility stage for more than a few years and has the worry of requiring a large capital outlay out front. When you add that to a number of fairly early stage exploration projects the result is a company without the near term potential to grow ounces significantly. I sat on Aurizon for almost 6 months based on its value story and the stock went nowhere.

At the other end of the spectrum is a company like Argonaut Gold. I owned Argonaut Gold for a while last fall but sold out way too soon. I sold because I saw the stock was priced dearly compared to many of its peers. However I failed to adequately account for the growth opportunities. It was a silly oversight; I had originally bought the stock because of the low capital cost heap leach projects that they could bring to market quickly. Somehow though I forgot about this, got caught up in the valuation and that led me to sell too early. The stock has since doubled to $10 before pulling back in the recent carnage that has brought all gold stocks to their knees.

When I was looking for gold producing companies a couple of weeks ago I was on the lookout for the next Argonaut Gold. Unfortunately I have not been able to find them (if you have some ideas, please drop me a note). In my opinion the closest comparison to Argonaut in terms of near term low capital cost growth potential is Atna Resources. Atna has a legitimate chance of increasing their gold production from 40,000 to over 150,000 ounces in the next couple of years. What makes Atna an imperfect comparison is that most of its projects hover around the cash cost level of $900 per oz, which is on the high side of the cash cost scale, whereas Argonaut has been able to achieve the double whammy of low cash cost low capital cost growth.

A second producer that I have bought (back) recently is OceanaGold. I have had good luck with buying OceanaGold when the market hates them and selling when the market starts to show some love. This time around I may hold on for a bit longer. OceanaGold has typically been one of the cheapest gold stocks on cash flow metrics. This is because, in part, they have struggled with costs and production at their existing mines. However, their soon to be producing mine in the Philippines (Didipio) will bring about some growth to the company, and perhaps more importantly, it will reduce the corporate cash flow numbers substantially.

One thing that got me interested in OceanaGold again was my research of Agnico-Eagle (which by the way is the third producer I own right now). While Agnico-Eagle has had some difficulties with the closure of their GOldex mine, they remain one of the best growth stories in the industry and I believe the market will come around to forgetting about Goldex and recognizing this once again. Agnico-Eagle owns 5 operating mines. Of those five, one mine, Meadowbank, produces about 1/3 of the production. At the corporate level, Agnico-Eagle has reasonably low cash costs. They were $594 per oz in the first quarter. However Meadowbank, the largest mine, has cash costs over $1000 per oz. On its own its a marginal mine that produces a large number of ounces. Together with the other low cost assets that Agnico has, it receives a much higher valuation than it would on its own.

I liken this situation to the one at OceanaGold. At OceanaGold, the corporate level cash costs should come down fairly substantially with the introduction of gold production from Didipio. Didipio will produce a lot of copper in addition to its gold, and this will make the cash costs of the project appear to be quite low. The cash costs of OceanaGold will not get down to the level of a company like Agnico-Eagle (the high cost mines at Oceana will continue to make up too much of the production) but I do not see it as unreasonable to think they will drop into the high $700 range. My bet on OceanaGold is that when production begins at Didipio, analysts will begin to revalue the company on the basis of a mid-cost producer rather than a high cost one, and that should provide for some upside in the stock.

I updated the spreadsheet below over the weekend. I did not update it during this week with stock prices for each stock tabled. The prices are as of Friday’s close. There has been so much movement in many of these gold names in the last couple days that the prices are already somewhat outdated.

My hope with gold and gold stocks is that this move is for real. What I think we need to have for this move to be real is action out of Europe that brings gold back into the system. I wrote this weekend about how, in general, the turmoil in Europe should cause weakness in paper currencies and lead to strength in gold. On Sunday Donald Coxe was interviewed on King World News and decribed a scenario whereby gold would be used along with a value added tax as colateral for euro-bonds on ther periphery. While I am a bit fuzzy on what the details of such a bond might be, I believe that conceptually this is the sort of event that has the potential to create a great rally. On the other hand my enthusiasm is tempered that if nothing is done in Europe, and if the Federal Reserve does indeed decide that QE is not working (I don’t think its nearly as clear as others do that the Fed will mindlessly embark on further quantitive easing. The Fed is, after all, a data centric institution, and if it appears that the benefits of QE are not what was anticipated, and I believe that has been the case, they may decide that a third installment is not beneficial).

Below is my spreadsheet comparison.

May 15

Was this why Atna was down yesterday?

In the last few months I have sold off most of my gold holdings, but I decided to stick it out with Atna Resources. That hasn’t looked like a terribly good decision these last couple of days, as the stock has been clobbered down to well below a buck.

Yesterday I looked at the stock thirty minutes before the market closed. It was at 94 cents. I was rather shocked to see later on that it had closed at 84 cents.

It being an earnings release day, I had already scoured the news release and determined it looked mostly benign. However I also know that Canadian regulations call for a filing of the Management Discussion and Analysis report on Sedar. The thing about Sedar is that these reports become available to paying subscribers a little bit before they do for the general public. When I saw the stock drop I wondered whether there was something in the MD&A that insited it.

This morning the MD&A was made publically available. Though I don’t think it is worthy of a 10% drop, I suspect that the following may have contributed to the drop:

The principal requirement within the next 12 months is expected to be funding development of the Pinson underground mine at a cost of $18 to $22 million. This range of costs is likely to increase when a new Technical Report is completed. Atna is considering additional sources of financing to address any potential contingent risk of having inadequate capital to complete the Pinson underground development in 2012, possibly to accelerate the development of Reward, and to ensure funding for the aforementioned projects.

Normally this might be seen as being fairly benign. In the current environment, where even good news is sold and investors are skittish that all gold stocks will soon be worthless, it carries a particular bite.

I always have known that Atna is skating on relatively thin ice with respect to the development costs of Pinson and the available cash on hand. The current report merely confirms that. I have to suspect that the reason the company has not released the technical report on Pinson (that they had originally said would be released at the beginning of May) is because they are trying to line up some financing to give the wiggle room they need. With the current share price depressed, I hope the financing is of the debt sort.

However before I concede yesterdays losses to this buried nugget of coal, it must be said that most gold stocks were down significantly. In fact it looked like a day where the larger institutions were throwing in the towel, with companies like Detour Gold and Osisko Mining down more than 10%.

It simply is a terribly time to own any gold stock. I had thought that the growth profile of Atna might overcome that gravity. Unfortunately that has not been the case.

The good news is that Atna is back to a level where it has completely unpriced Pinson from the share price. In other words, how much lower could it possibly go? You also have to wonder whether there are intermediates looking at the company. A company like Aurizon for example, with $200M in cash, could buy Atna, develop Pinson and have a growth platform for the future, all of which could likely be had for less than what they have in the bank.

I remain committed to my shares. The company has the potential to generate cash flow from Reward and Pinson next year that will match or exceed the current share price. Its too bad that the company hasn’t been a bit more prudent in managing cash levels and taking advantage of the $1.50 share price to raise a buffer of cash but that is what it is. The stock, like so many gold stocks, remains deeply depressed and it seems foolish to me to sell my shares at these levels.