Adventures in Ethanol
Over the last week I have played some parts of the ethanol yo-yo well and other parts not so well. Let me review.
On the well side, I significantly reduced my extremely over-sized position in Pacific Ethanol (25% of my portfolio at its peak) at prices of about $23 per share. On the not-so-well side, I added/subtracted and then added back my position in Rex Energy on continuously declining prices and held on to a still not insignificant percentage of Pacific Ethanol (about 5% position) through the declines of Thursday and Friday. What is yest to be determine is that I added back some of Pacific Ethanol at $20.15 on Thursday. While I sold half of that on Friday morning for a bit of a profit, I held the other half through the decline on Friday and now sit with those shares at a lower price than I had purchased them for.
How this all ends remains to be seen. This blog is not intended to be an account of my infallibility. Unlike many others on the blogosphere and on twitter, I have no omniscient insight into what can be absolutely stated as a good or bad decision. Thus it is that you rarely see me laying out the ridicule, condescension or my favorite, the passive-aggressive rhetoric, that seems to be so prevalent in these mediums. I can only wish for such certitude. Unfortunately my world is far too gray to not feel empathetic for those who hold a different opinion than mine.
The beauty and horror of the ethanol stock is that it only takes a small difference of opinion to lead to a drastically different conclusion. To take an example that I tweeted earlier tonight, in my model I get a $1 quarterly earning swing by adjusting the ethanol price by 20 cents – from $2.05 to $1.85 per gallon (note I originally had written 80c but I hadn’t been making an apples to apples comparison in my model). A similar point could be made about Pacific Ethanol. The significance of course is that 20 cents is about the swing that ethanol prices took in the last week. Read more






